SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 650

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinita Phaye, Government Advocate for applicant/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision has been preferred under section 397 read with section 401 of Cr.P.C. by the applicant/State being aggrieved by the order dated 12.12.2020 passed by JMFC, Indore in Case No.6891/2020 under section 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 in Crime No.11/20202 registered at Police station, Annapurna, Indore whereby the respondent has been granted default bail under section 167(2) of CrPC for non compliance of the aforesaid provision in filing the charge sheet within the prescribed period.

2. In the present case, notice was issued to the respondent on 28.6.2021 but he did not appear then again even after service of the notices, SPC was issued on 9.9.2021, but again no response has been made on behalf of the respondent though served. Hence, proper opportunity has already been granted to the respondent.

3. The facts in short is that, the petitioner was granted default bail by the learned trial Court on 12.12.2020 with regard to the provisions as stated above considering the fact that the prosecution has not filed the charge-sheet against the respondent within 60 days and the same was filed within 72 days, which is an admitted fact.

4. Learned counsel for the State has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top