SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 618

VIVEK RUSIA
Girjesh – Appellant
Versus
Sandhya – Respondent


Advocates:
Abhishek Tugnawat for applicant.

ORDER

1. The petitioner/husband has filed the present petition under Article. 227 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by order dated 27.9.2021 whereby the application filed by the respondent/wife under Order 9 rule 13 of the C.P.C. has been allowed and exparte judgment and decree dated 14.2.2020 has been set aside.

2. Facts of the case in short are as under:-

i. The marriage of the petitioner and respondent held 10 years ago under Hindu rituals and customs. Out of their wedlock respondent gave birth to a female child who is at present is 9 years old. The respondent is working as ASHA Karyakarta in Gram Panchayat, Chandrapura DistrictNeemuch. A dispute arose between husband and wife, and they have started living separately. Mediation and conciliation took place between them, but failed . Hence the petitioner filed a petition under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Second Addl. District Judge, Manasa, District-Neemuch seeking dissolution of marriage. Notice was issued to the wife respondent and despite service she did not appear on dated 9.1.2020 accordingly she was proceeded ex-parte. Learned Addl. District Judge has passed an exparte judgment and decree dated 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top