SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Dulari Devi – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Poddar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Om Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

The instant misc. appeal has been preferred by the appellant Dulari Devi for assailing the order dated 19.2.2020 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Churu in Misc. Case No. 131/2018, whereby the application preferred by the appellant under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. was dismissed.

2. We have heard and considered the submissions advanced by the counsel representing the appellant and have gone through the impugned order.

3. The respondent filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 4.4.2018. Notice of the application was served on the appellant, who failed to appear despite service of notice, whereupon the learned Family Court proceeded to accept the application preferred by the respondent husband and passed an ex-parte decree dated 17.7.2018 directing dissolution of marriage of the appellant and the respondent. The appellant filed the application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. alleging that as a matter of fact, the notice of the application was never served on her. She was made to sign the summon by keeping her in dark. The respondent fraudulently got her to sign an agreement dated 28.2.2018. The appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top