SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 638

S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Archana Pawar (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Dheeraj Tiwari for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to take cognizance of the matter on an application filed by the petitioner and take action against the accused persons and after carrying out fair and impartial investigation into the matter shall file charge sheet before the competent Court having criminal jurisdiction.

2. Brief facts leading to filing of this case are that on 19.7.2020 respondent No.5 committed marpeet, misbehavior and slapped the petitioner when she tried to resist, the respondent No.5 started abusing due to private and personal grudge and threatened her to implicate in the false case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Police Authorities being hand-in-glove with the complainant refused to register the FIR lodged by the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has made complaints dated 21.7.2020, 30.12.2020 and 24.6.2021 (Annexure P-2 to P-5) to the higher authorities for conducting fair and impartial investigation in the matter, but to no avail. Accordingly, it is prayed that respondents/Police Authorities may be directed to take cognizance of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top