SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
Ghanshyam Das Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
'(A) It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to conduct the fair, impartial and proper enquiry into the complaint made by the petitioner and take strong action against the Respondent No.5-10 and further be please to issue the appropriate direction to the respondents police to register the FIR against the responsible persons/Respondent No.5-10.
(B) It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents to decide/consider the representation of the petitioner.
(C) Any other relief as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of this case, along with the cost of this writ petition be also awarded.'
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondents No.3 and 4 in not registering the FIR against respondents No.5 to 10. In this regard, petitioner has preferred several written complaints before respondent No.4- SHO, Police Station Waidhan, District Singrauli (M.P.) but no action whatsoever has been taken thereupon. As su
Dilawar Singh vs. State of Delhi 2007 (10) JT 585
Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others ((2008)2 SCC 409
Shweta Bhadoriya Vs. State of M.P. & others (2017 (1) MPLJ (Cri) 338)
State of Bihar vs. A.C. Saldanna AIR 1980 SC 326
Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v. Hent Dhage mant Yashwaand Others ((2016)6 SCC 277
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.