Guddi Bai vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(MP) 1151

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
Guddi Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Shafiqullah, Advocate, G.K. Patel, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J. - The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

'(A) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 & 3 to registered an FIR against the respondent no.4 to 6 and investigate the matter on the report lodged by the petitioner Annexure P-2 to P-5 in the interest of justice.

(B) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also granted in favour of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by inaction of respondents No.2 and 3 in not registering the FIR against respondents No.4 to 6. In this regard, the petitioner has preferred several representations i.e. Annexures P/2, P/3, P/4 and P/5 for registering the FIR but no action whatsoever has been taken thereupon. As such, the instant petition has been filed.

3. Per contra learned Government Advocate for the respondents/State contend that the relief prayed in this petition cannot be granted to the petitioner in view of the fact that petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document