SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 92

ANAND PATHAK
Child In Conflict With Law – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
V. D. Sharma for applicant;
Ramdhar Chaubey, Public Prosecutor for respondent/State;
Arun Pateriya for complainant.

ORDER

1. The instant criminal revision under section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is being filed, assailing the order dated 29.6.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 328/2016 by Tenth Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior rejecting appeal of petitioner and affirming the order dated 14.6.2016 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Gwalior in Case No. 117/2016; whereby, the application of petitioner for grant of bail was rejected.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that an FIR dated 14.2.2016 bearing Crime No. 95/2016 for offence under section 147, 149, 302, 396, 307 of IPC, 25/27 of Arms Act and section 13 of MPDVPK Act was registered by Police Station Gole Ka Mandir against the present petitioner as well as some other accused persons on the basis of allegations that petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons intercepted the complainant, who was going to attend some programme alongwith two companions Mangal Singh and Shankar Singh (deceased), they were looted by the accused persons. Thereafter, accused opened fire over the complainant party in which Shankar Singh died due to fire arm injury.

3. Since at the time of alle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top