SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 53

SUNITA YADAV
Madan Singh Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
Reena Raghuvanshi – Respondent


Advocates:
S. K. Shrivastava for petitioner; P. S. Raghuvanshi for respondents.

ORDER

1. The present petition is filed assailing the order dated 29.8.2019 passed in Civil Suit No.RCS A/100003/2016 by First Additional District Judge, Sironj District Vidisha.

2. The facts in brief to decide the petition are that the plaintiff has filed a civil suit for declaration, possession and for grant of mesne profit on the ground that the plaintiff is the owner of the property which he has purchased vide registered sale-deed dated 23.2.2000 from Ravi Rai S/o Shri Babulal and Suraj Bai W/o Shri Babulal. It was further pleaded by the plaintiff that defendant No.2 namely Raghunath Singh is father of the plaintiff and he wanted to start a business of selling and purchasing of tractor and therefor he took the property in question. It was further pleaded that defendant No.1/petitioner used to work with defendant No.2 and since he was not having any place to reside in Sironj, therefore, defendant No.2 allowed defendant No.1 to reside on the first floor and consequently since February 2011 defendant No.1 along with his family is residing in the disputed property. It was further pleaded that since August 2013, defendant No.2 has closed down the business of selling and purchasing of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top