SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 154

VISHAL MISHRA
Rameshchandra – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Mohd. Aadil Usmani for petitioners;
Dayaram Vishwakarma for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

With the consent of the parties the matter is finally heard.

1. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated 16.9.2019, passed in RCS No.41A/2018, by First Civil Judge Class-II, Pipariya, District Hoshangabad; whereby, the application filed by the petitioners under Order 3 rule 1 of CPC seeking permission to record the evidence through his registered Power of Attorney i.e. his son Shusheel Kumar Sharma was rejected.

2. It is submitted that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction with respect to the suit property bearing Khasra No.96, Area being 8.36 Acres against the respondent No.1, which is a joint property of a Hindu Undivided Family, but the Survey No.96/1, Area being 1.529 Hectares out of the said property has wrongly been registered in the name of the respondent No.1/defendant No.1. He has also sought the relief of permanent injunction to restrain the respondent No.1 to alienate or transfer the said property in some other names. On summons being issued, the respondent No.1/defendant No.1 appeared in the civil suit and filed the written statement denying all the averments and has further taken a ple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top