SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 67

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Pawan Diwakar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Dinesh Kumar Koshal for petitioner, Akshya Pawar, Panel Laywer for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 6.4.2018 (Annexure P/3), whereby, respondent No.1 has rejected his application for grant of licence for a revolver.

2. The brief facts of the case are that petitioner is a permanent resident of district Seoni and is running multiple businesses. He apprehended danger of his life from smugglers of cows, dacoits and thieves, therefore, for self defense, he applied for the licence of aforesaid Arms which although was recommended by the Superintendent of Police, Seoni, however, the same has been rejected by respondent No.1 without assigning any reason.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner placed reliance on a Division Bench decision of this Court in the matter of Chhotelal Pachori v. State of M.P. and others 2019 (1)JLJ 495 = 2019(2) MPLJ 697. and a recent decision of this Court in the case of Shishir Tiwari v. The State of M.P. and others W.A.No.1295/2021 decided on 13.1.2022.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State opposed petition. He submits that before grant of Arms licence every aspect of the matter is required to be considered. On the facts of the present case it has been found that petitioner’s applicat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top