VISHAL DHAGAT
Trivikram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Yashodanandan Dwivedi – Respondent
ORDER
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 10.11.2021 contained in Annexure-P/1.
2. By impugned order dated 10.11.2021 contained in Annexure-P/1, appellate Court has stayed order of injunction.
3. Counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that order of appellate Court suffers from illegality and is without jurisdiction. It is submitted that appellate Court cannot pass order of stay over grant of injunction. Counsel appearing for petitioner relied on judgment reported in (1997) 5 ALT 776, in case of Pothuru Venkata Rama Raju v. Yandra Venkata Narsayya and others. He relied on para 9 of the said judgment which is quoted as under:-
“9. It has to be borne in mind that there is any amount of difference between a decree for recovery of money or a decree for possession on one hand and a decree for perpetual injunction on the other. In the former cases, the decrees are executable and whenever an appeal is filed, interim stay is granted with a view to maintain the status quo between the parties. Order 41 rule 5 C.P.C. empowers an appellate Court to pass such an order in respect of such decrees. Whereas in the latt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.