SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 700

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Archana Puri, J.
Manjit Kaur @ Rani Through his Lrs - Petitioners - Appellant
Versus
Raghu Khosla and Another - Respondents - Respondent
CR-234 of 2023
Decided On : 22-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. R.S.Chauhan, Mr. Rohit Sapehiya and Ms. Deepika Chauhan, Advocates for the petitioner(s).
Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate for the respondents.

The court's jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be invoked to direct the expeditious disposal of a stay application filed along with an appeal, especially when the pendency of the application causes constraint upon the petitioner's rights and jeopardizes property rights.

Headnote:

Stay Application - Jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution of India - The court directed the lower appellate court to expeditiously dispose of the application for grant of stay filed along with the appeal, as the pendency of the application was causing constraint upon the rights of the petitioner(s) whose property rights were jeopardized.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of the court for issuance of a direction to the lower court to decide the stay application filed along with the appeal, as no order had been passed on the stay application and the property rights of the petitioner were jeopardized.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the lower appellate court to expeditiously dispose of the application for grant of stay, considering the constraints upon the petitioner's rights due to the pendency of the application and the jeopardy to the property rights.

Issues: Pendency of stay application, jeopardy to property rights, failure of lower appellate court to pass order on stay application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of the stay application to address the constraints upon the petitioner's rights and the jeopardy to the property rights.

Final Decision: The instant revision petitions stand disposed of, with the lower appellate court directed to dispose of the application for grant of stay expeditiously.

ARCHANA PURI, J.

1. The petitioner(s) has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India, for issuance of appropriate direction to learned Lower Court, for deciding the stay application dated 07.12.2022 (Annexure P-4), filed under Order 41 Rule 5 read with Section 5 of CPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that an application for stay, which was filed along with the appeal, to challenge the order dated 10.10.2022, passed on an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, an application for grant of stay was also filed, but however, no order has been passed on the stay application by learned Lower Appellate Court. Simultaneously, the respondents are also pursuing the execution filed and warrant of possession has been ordered to be issued against the property of the present petitioner(s).

3. The appeal is stated to have been filed on 07.12.2022 and the pendency of the application for stay, as such, is causing constraint upon the rights of the petitioner(s), whose rights, vis-a-vis, the property in question are jeopardized on account of issuance of warrant of possession. Even, it is submitted that the respondents have been proceeded against ex parte before learned Lower Appellate Court and even then, no order relating to the stay application has been passed.

4. In the given circumstances, learned Lower Appellate Court shall look into the matter and dispose of the application for grant of stay, expeditiously, if not the main appeal.

5. Mr.V.K.Sandhir, Advocate, has made appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 and filed Power of Attorney, which is taken on record.

6. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 also undertakes to make appearance on 15.09.2023 i.e. the date already fixed before learned Lower Appellate Court.

7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant revision petitions stands disposed of.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top