SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 97

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
Gayatri Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mrigendra Singh with Ms. Guncha Rasool for petitioner; Ms. G.K. Patel, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.

In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the order dt. 3.2.2009 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No.4, whereby she has been terminated from the post of Lecturer (Hindi).

2. Brief facts leading to filing of this case are that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the private institution named as Janta Higher Secondary School, Majhgawan, District Rewa and was subsequently promoted as Lecturer on 1.7.1998 by the Education Committee of the school. On 1.12.2000, the State Government took over Janta Higher Secondary School, Majhgawan and posts were sanctioned for absorption of employees working therein. Thereafter, the name of the petitioner was considered by the screening committee and she was found fit for absorption on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade I. Copy of recommendation letter dt.18.4.2001 is annexed as Annexure P/2 as well as report of screening committee is annexed as Annexure P/3. The Principal of the school also issued a certificate on 9.8.2008 to the effect that the name of the petitioner has been sent for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top