SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 159

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J.
Rajendra Prasad v. State of M. P. (Madhya Pradesh)
Criminal Appeal No. 458 of 1998 (Jabalpur): against the judgment and sentence dated 19.1.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act in Special Case No. 58/1997; Decided on 10.5.2022

Advocates:
Manish Kholia, Amicus Curiae for appellant;
Dinesh Prasad Patel, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

Headnote:

Penal Code, 1860 -- S. 325 -- incident of maarpeet took place over issue of electric wire cast in garden of accused -- evidence of injured complainant corroborated not only from evidence of eye witnesses but also from evidence of medical witnesses and promptly lodged FIR -- discrepancy about time of incident ranges from 3 pm to 6 pm -- cannot be said to be material, affecting truthfulness of prosecution story -- out of eight injuries, three grievous in nature -- overwhelming, clear and cogent evidence regarding criminal act committed by accused cannot be discarded merely because of some minor discrepancies like time of incident, where witnesses are illiterate or semi-illiterate villagers -- finding of guilt confirmed -- sentence -- complainant beaten mercilessly over petty issue -- accused does not deserve any leniency -- deserves exemplary punishment -- sentence of only one year with fine of Rs. 1,000/- is on lower side -- no case for interference or reduction of sentence made out. AIR 2000 SC 2854 followed. [Paras 16 to 21 & 23

naM lafgrk] 1860 && /kkjk 325 && vfHk;qDr ds ckx esa fxjs fo|qr ds rkj ds fookn ij ekjihV dh ?kVuk ?kVh && {kfrxzLr f'kdk;rdrkZ dk lk{; izR;{kn'khZ lkf{k;ksa ds lk{; ls gh ugha vfirq fpfdRlh; lkf{k;ksa ds lk{; rFkk vfoyac nkf[ky dh xbZ izFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ ls Hkh laiq"V && ?kVuk ds le; ds lacaèk esa QdZ vijkUg 3 ls vijkUg 6 rd dk && bruk rkfRod ugha dgk tk ldrk fd vfHk;kstui{k dh dgkuh dh lR;rk izHkkfor gks && vkB esa ls rhu {kfr;k¡ xaHkhj izÑfr dh && tgk¡ lk{kh vuiढ+ ;k vYif'kf{kr xzkeh.k gSa] ogk¡ vfHk;qDr }kjk fd, x, vkijkf/kd ÑR; ds ckjs esa vizfrjks/;] Li"V vkSj rdZiw.kZ lk{; dsoy ?kVuk ds le; tSls xkS.k QdZ ds dkj.k R;Dr ugha fd;k tk ldrk && nks"k dk fu"d"kZ iq"V && naMkns'k && f'kdk;rdrkZ dks rqPN fookn ij funZ;rk ls ihVk x;k && vfHk;qDr mnkjrk dk ik= ugha && n`"VkarLo:i naM ds ;ksX; && #- 1]000@& ds tqekZus lfgr ek= ,d o"kZ dk naMkns'k derj gS && gLr{ksi vFkok naMkns'k de djus dk ekeyk ugha curkA , vkb vkj 2000 ,l lh 2854 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 16 ls 21 ,oa 23

ORDER

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374(2) of Cr.P.C against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.1.1998 passed by ASJ/Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in S.C.No.58/1997 (State of M.P v. Rajendra Prasad) whereby appellant has been convicted for commission of offence under section 325 of IPC and has been sentenced to 1 year R.I and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of payment of fine he shall further undergo R.I for 6 months.

2. The prosecution case is that on 22.1.1996, at around 11:45 am, Biharilal Kol, resident of village Bhadra, Pipariya appeared at Police Station AJK, Jabalpur and lodged FIR stating that he is resident of village Bhadra, Pipariya and is an agriculturist. On 21.1.1996 at around 6 PM, his neighbour Rajendra Yadav abused him and asked as to why you have cast wire from his garden (Baadi). At this, he asked him not to abuse, he will remove his wire. When he was removing his wire, Rajendra Yadav again abused him and told that he will not understand and started to beat him by means of lathi causing injuries on his right cheek, left hand wrist, finger, chest, stomach, in the back of neck and in the teeth. At this, when he shouted "save save" Rajendra Yadav is killing him, Shukla ji of Dasraman, his brother Fugga and sister Sukko Bai reached there and pacified the matter. If they would have not reached there, Rajendra Yadav had certainly killed him. Rajendra Yadav threatened him if he approached police station, he will eliminate him. Due to fear, he did not come to police station in the night.

3. On the basis of above narration given by Biharilal P.W-1, an FIR was registered at FIR No.04/1996 of AJK Police Station, Jabalpur for commission of offence under sections 294, 506, 323 of IPC and 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Injured Bihari was sent to hospital for examination and thereafter for x-ray. There were fractures in his left ulna, proximal phalanx of ring and little fingers.

4. After investigation, Police filed charge-sheet against appellant accused before ASJ/Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Jabalpur for commission of offence under sections 294, 506, 323 of IPC and section 3(1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

5. The accused pleaded not guilty. His defence is that he had asked Biharilal not tocast wire through his garden. Bihari had beaten him. Bihari has lodged false report against him.

6. In this appeal it is argued by the learned counsel for appellant that learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the evidence of prosecution and defence witnesses. Incident took place almost 26 years back, therefore, if conviction is confirmed, appellant be released after imposing heavy fine.

7. It would be proper to deal with the medical evidence first. Dr. B.S.Chouhan, P.W-4 and Dr. M.M.Agrawal, P.W-6 have been examined. From their evidence, it is proved that injuries found on the person of complainant/injured Bihari are as under :

(i) Lacerated wound 3/4 inch x 1/2 inch, muscle deep right upper elbow.

(ii) Contusion 2 inch x 3/4 inch, diffused swelling around interior post right mid cheek.

(iii) Contusion dark, diffused swelling 3 inch x 3/4 inch interior post about 1/2 inch below injury no.2.

(iv) Deformity in left ring finger.

(v) Multiple dark brown contusion 1 inch x 1/2 inch 2 x 3 inch in zigzag ranging from left forearm to back.

(vi) Multiple contusion dark in zigzag pattern ranging from 3 inch x 1 inch x 1/2 inch on abdomen.

(vii) Contusion multi coloured 2 inch x 8 inch over left scapular region.

(viii) Contusion multi coloured 4 inch x 1 inch over right scapular region.

8. X-ray was advised for injury No.2, 3, 4 and 5. Except injury No. 2, 3, 4 and 5, rest other injuries were simple in nature. Injuries were caused within 24 hours of the examination. Dr. B.S.Chouhan, P.W-4 has proved MLC report Exhibit-P/3 dated 22.1.1996.

9. M.M.Agrawal, P.W-6 has deposed that on 27.1.1996, he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top