SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 278

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Munna@ Rafiq – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) [in short “Cr.P.C.”] against the judgement dated 31.3.1999 passed by the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Indore (M.P.) in Special Case No.81/97, for the offences punishable under sections 450 and 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short “IPC”) and section 3(1)(11) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short “SC/ST Act”) and sentenced him as under:

S. No.

Conviction

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine amount

Additional imprisonment in default of payment of fine

1.

450 of IPC

5 years RI

--

--

2.

376(1) of IPC

7 years RI

--

--

3.

3(1)(11) of SC/ST Act

6 months RI

Rs. 500/-

1 month RI

2. Prosecution story, in brief is as follows :-

(i) Prosecutrix, who is a member of the Scheduled Castes/Schedule Tribe community was residing with her family in village Malikhedi for last about six months. On 22.1.1995 in the evening when her husband had gone to irrigate Narayan Khati's

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top