RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Jagdish S/o Mangilal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') against the judgment dated 05.11.1999 passed by Special Sessions Judge, District Shajapur in Special. S.T. No.23/1999, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 07 years R.I. and acquitted the appellant from the charges under Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (P.A.) Act.
2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, is that on 12.04.1999 at about 11AM, when the prosecutrix was going to deliver food on the field to her daughter and reached near the filed of one Anokhi, the appellant order to stop her and when she was not stopped then he picked her from back side and after dashing her in a culvert (nullah), committed rape upon her against her will. When she tried to call someone, the appellant shut her mouth with a cloth. After committing the offence, the appellant ran away from the spot then she reached to her village after delivering the food and narrated the incident to Radheshyam, Jagdish and Prahalad and lodged the FIR with her husband to the police station Sarangpur.
3. Thereafter, the police
B.C. Deva @ Dyava vs. State of karnataka
Kansa Behera vs. State of Orissa
Rafiq vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Lack of corroborative medical evidence and absence of injury undermines the prosecution's case in establishing forcible rape.
Acquittal in rape case upheld where prosecutrix turns hostile, denies force, disputes age records claiming majority, rendering testimony unreliable amid contradictions; prosecution fails beyond reaso....
The conviction for rape based solely on the prosecutrix's testimony was quashed due to inconsistencies and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and corroborated testimony....
In a rape case accused could be convicted on sole testimony of prosecutrix, if it is capable of inspiring of confidence in mind of court. If version given by prosecutrix is unsupported by any medical....
The conviction for rape was upheld based on the prosecutrix's credible testimony, while the conviction under the SC/ST Act was quashed due to lack of evidence regarding the accused's knowledge of the....
Rape – Conviction can be sustained on sole testimony of prosecutrix if it inspires confidence – There is no rule of law or practice that evidence of prosecutrix cannot be relied upon without corrobor....
The Court established that a victim's testimony can suffice for conviction in rape cases, even without medical corroboration, provided it is credible.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.