SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 317

ANAND PATHAK
Amrit Lal Basedia – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Dilip Kumar Pathak for petitioners; Nitin Goyal; Panel Lawyer, for respondent No.1/State; S.S. Dhakad for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

1. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioners under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashment of FIR registered at Crime No.587/2014 at Police Station- Thatipur, District -Gwalior for the offence under sections 498-A, 506 Part- II, 34 of the IPC and section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise.

2. It appears that parties agreed to settle the matter and therefore, applications vide I.A. No.13071/2022 and I.A. No.13072/2022 have been preferred at the instance of parties and they want to settle the matter. The applications are duly signed by respective parties (power of attorney holder on behalf of complainant) and same are supported by their affidavits.

3. The Principal Registrar of this Court has duly verified the parties, contents of applications, intent and signatures of parties. Report is attached, same is perused and it appears that compromise has been reached between the parties voluntarily without any threat, inducement and coercion. Petitioners expressed their desire to serve National/Social cause to purge their misdeeds and / or to express gratitude for institutions which served the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top