SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 354

PRANAY VERMA
Secretary Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Neemuch – Appellant
Versus
Tarabai Through LRs Nahar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Kamal Airen for petitioner; Vishal Baheti for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner/judgment debtor against the order dated 19.5.2011 (Annexure-P-5) passed by the executing Court rejecting an application filed by it and also against the order dated 19.6.2012 Annexure-P-9 passed by it whereby the petitioner has been directed to furnish an affidavit to the effect as to whether it is creating obstruction in possession of respondent or not.

2. The petitioner Krishi Upaj Mandi allotted plot No. 68 to the respondent/decree holder by virtue of a lease deed executed on 1.1.1968 for a period of thirty years. Subsequently, the lease deed was renewed on 30.8.1979 with a renewal clause as per which the lease could be renewed. A suit was filed by the respondent for declaration and permanent injunction in which a compromise was entered into between the parties on 7.7.1999 and a decree in terms of the said compromise was passed on 17.11.1999. The terms of the compromise were that the respondent had filed a map for sanction on 25.7.1982 which was to be sanctioned by the petitioner and the respondent was at liberty to raise construction on the plot as per terms of the lease deed. A decree for permanent injunction was gra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top