SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 364

PRANAY VERMA
Trilochan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Indrajeet Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Anant Athawle for applicant; Ms. Meena Chapekar for non-applicant.

ORDER

1. This Revision under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicant/plaintiff against the order dated 23.1.2022 passed in Civil Suit No.88-A/2015 by the VIth Civil Judge, Class-I, District Dewas whereby his application under Order 23 Rule 1 and 3 of the CPC for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit has been rejected.

2. The facts of the case are that plaintiff instituted an action on or about 14.9.2015 against the defendant for declaration of his half share in the suit lands, for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to remove his construction from over his share in the suit land and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from making any construction in the future or alienating the suit land in any manner. Upon service of summons upon her the defendant has contested the plaintiff's claim by filing her written statement on 21.6.2016.

3. During course of proceedings before the trial Court the plaintiff filed an application under Order 23 Rule 1 and 3 of the CPC for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit on the same facts and cause of action. The plaintiff submitted that only affidavits i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top