SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 388

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Naman Laddha – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S. Rathore for petitioner; Ms. Suma Maheshwari, Penal Lawyer, for respondent/State.

ORDER

Singh, J:- 1. This petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred for quashment of FIR bearing Crime No.08/2022, registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Indore, District Indore against the petitioner for the offences punishable under sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and subsequent criminal proceedings of RCT No.1226/2022, pending before the Court of JMFC, Indore , Distt Indore.

2. Brief facts giving rise to this petition are that on 6.1.2022 at about 21:22 hours, after receiving a secret information that prostitution is being carried out in Vijaynagar area at Atoms Salon and Skin Clinic, SHO Police Station Mahila Thana, Indore, Jyoti Sharma alongwith other police officials, Panch-witnesses and Punter carried out a raid at the premises referred to above. During the course of raid, petitioner and a lady; co-accused Valalakh were found in room no.1 of the spa center in compromising position. In other rooms, other co-accused persons were also found in compromising position, while co-accused personas Chandni and Sanjay who were found sitting on the counter. On inquiry, it was found that co-accused perso

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top