SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 214

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
In Reference (Suo Motu) – Appellant
Versus
Sudama Baghel (Advocate) – Respondent


Advocates:
Balram Koshta for respondent.

ORDER

1. These suo motu proceedings for criminal contempt were initiated in pursuance to a reference sent by Shri Pradeep Kumar Soni, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chhindwara under section 15 (2) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1971’) for registration of Criminal Contempt against accused Shri Sudama Baghel s/o late Shri Ratiram Baghel alleging that on 18.1.2020 when he was on remand duty, the respondent/accused being inebriated condition was shouting in the Court premises. While he was going to the Court, the respondent/accused called out in an indecent manner, stopped him and when he objected, the respondent/accused rushed and made gesture to attack him. When he came into the Court room, the accused/respondent continued shouting, threatening, uttering swearing words nearby the Court room. Because of the act of the respondent/accused, he was not able to perform his work. He had submitted an application to the Police Station Kotwali, Chhindwara and after investigation, a complaint was filed before the Executive Magistrate Chhindwara. Medical report shows that the respondent/accused was in inebriated state and talking nonsense. Prior to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top