IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Khalka @ Kholak Singh v. State of M.P.
Criminal Appeal No. 576 of 2011 (G); Decided on 8.5.2023
Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 357 -- Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 323 and 325 -- conviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt -- sentence of 6 months RI -- thirteen years lapsed -- never stayed in custody -- fine amount already deposited -- jail sentence reduced to period already undergone -- fine enhanced from Rs. 500/- to Rs. 15,000/- payable to complainant. [Para 5]
naM çfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 357 & naM lafgrk] 1860 & èkkjk 323 rFkk 325 & LosPN;k Ĩj migfr dkfjr djus d¢ fy, n¨"kflf) & Ng ekl d¢ dB¨j dkjkokl dk naMkns'k & rsjg o"kZ O;rhr & dÒh vfÒj{kk esa ugha jgk & tqekZus dh jde igys gh fuf{kIr & tsy naMkns'k ÄVkdj igys gh Ò¨xh xà dkykofèk dk fd;k x;k & ifjoknh d¨ lans; tqekZuk #i;s 500@& ls cढ+kdj #i;s 15]000@& fd;k x;kA ¼iSjk 5½
ORDER
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants under section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 5.7.2011 passed by Additional Session Session Judge, Karera, District- Shivpuri (M.P.) in S.T. No.95/2010, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Appellant | Section | Sentence | Fine | Default Stipulation |
| Khalka @ Khalak Singh | 323 of IPC | 6 Months RI | Rs. 500/- | 1 Month RI |
| Jaswant Singh | 325 of IPC | 2 Years RI | Rs. 1000/- | 3 Months RI |
| Santosh Singh | 323 of IPC | 6 Months RI | Rs. 500/- | 1 Month RI |
2. Prosecution story, in short, is that on 17.11.2009 at about 4-5 PM, complainant alongwith his wife and daughter-in-law were working in the field, at that time, appellant No.1 came there and said that he ploughed his field. When the complainant objected the same, appellants started abusing him. When he stopped them not to abuse, appellants assaulted him and his wife by means of Axe, due to which, they received injuries. Thereafter, they ran away from the spot threatening them to dire consequences. On the basis of aforesaid, FIR was registered against the appellants.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that incident is of the year 2009 and more than 13 years have lapsed. Appellants have never served in custody for a single day. The fine amount has already been deposited by them. As far as the sentence of the appellants for the aforesaid offences is concerned, it is submitted by counsel for the appellants that by enhancing the fine amount suitably under Sections 323 & 325 of IPC, the substantive jail sentence awarded to the appellants may be reduced to the period already undergone by them.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State while opposing the appeal has submitted that the learned Court below arrived on the appropriate finding and rightly passed the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence.
5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, ends of justice would meet if while reducing the jail sentence of the appellants to the period already undergone by them for the offence under section 323 of IPC, the fine amount is enhanced from Rs.500/- to Rs.1000/ each and for the offence under section 325 of IPC, the fine amount is enhanced from Rs.1000/- to Rs.15,000/- each. Accordingly, while affirming the conviction of the appellants for the aforesaid offence, jail sentence of the appellants is reduced to the period already undergone by them but fine amount is enhanced as indicated above to be deposited by them which shall be payable to the injured persons on adjustment of fine amount as already deposited by them before the trial Court within a period of two months from today, failing which the appellants will have to suffer further one month and three months imprisonment as awarded by the Court below. The amount of fine so deposited by the appellants be given to the complainant/injured/victim as directed above under section 357 of Cr.P.C on due verification of identity of them.
In view of the above, this appeal is finally disposed of.
The court has the discretion to consider the time elapsed since the incident and adjust the sentence accordingly, while also providing for compensation to the victim under Section 357 of Cr.P.C.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the affirmation of the conviction under sections 323 and 452 IPC, and the modification of the sentence to the period already undergone by the appel....
The court may reduce the sentence due to delay in the case and the appellants' current circumstances.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.