SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 53

DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Shrilal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Anand Kumar Gupta for petitioners; C.P. Singh, Panel Lawyer, for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This revision under section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners against the judgment dated 3.9.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Chachoda District Guna (M.P.) in Criminal Appeal No.212/2007 affirming the judgment dated 16.3.2007 passed in criminal case No.508/2005 by JMFC Chachoda District Guna by which petitioners have been convicted for the offence punishable under section 325/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 3 months R.I. with fine of Rs. 300/- each with default stipulation.

2. In brief facts of the case are that on 22.2.1997 complainant Shivraj Singh lodged a report against petitioners that they committed marpeet with him by means of Lathi due to which he got fracture. Report was lodged. After investigation, charge-sheet in the matter was filed. Learned trial Court after appreciating the evidence on record, convicted the petitioners for the aforesaid offence.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners/accused submitted that he does not want to challenge the conviction of the petitioners for the aforesaid offence. As regards sentence, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the incident took place on 22.2.1997. Petitioners are fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top