Ramesh Kumar Dhurve vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(MP) 169

ANAND PATHAK
Ramesh Kumar Dhurve – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Sushil Kumar Sharma for petitioner; Manu v. John, Panel Lawyer, for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:-

“(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the impugned orders dated 19.3.2001 (Annexure P-8), appellate order dated 21.2.2002 (Annexure P-10) and order of mercy appeal dated 26.10.2002 (Annexure P-11) and direct the Respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service as Constable with all consequential benefit.

(B) The Respondents may also be directed to produce entire record pertains to departmental enquiry against the petitioner.

(C) Any other relief or reliefs, order or orders, direction or directions which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioner.

(D) Cost of the petition be awarded to the petitioner.”

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petitioner was initially appointed as Constable in the Establishment of Madhya Pradesh Police. On 13.9.1997, petitioner while posted as Guard at Syndicate Bank did not turn up for duty, therefore, absence was recorded in Roj Namacha. Thereafter, between the period 13.9.1997 to 26.11.1997 for total 75 days, he remained absent without sanction of leave. Thereaf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document