SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 781

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
SUBODH ABHYANKAR, J.
 
Ghanshyam Bhati S/o Shri Parmanand Bhati Thr. Guardian Shri Ghisalal Bhati - Appellant 
Versus
General Administration Department And Others - Respondents 
Writ Petition No. 25511 of 2019
Decided on : 04-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri L. C. Patne - Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Mradula Sen

A caste certificate may be issued based on existing certificates of family members, irrespective of discrepancies in revenue records, recognizing the Mogia caste as a Scheduled Tribe.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition challenging the refusal to issue a scheduled tribe caste certificate - The respondent SDO rejected the application citing discrepancies in the revenue record regarding petitioner’s caste - The petitioner referenced his father's previously issued caste certificate and relevant government circular establishing the recognition of the Mogia caste as a Scheduled Tribe. (Paras 3-5)

(B) Legal recognition of caste - The court reiterated that a caste certificate issued to a family member should be sufficient for issuing a certificate to the applicant, as per the relevant circular. (Paras 5, 9)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner's application for a caste certificate was denied due to conflicting records identifying his caste as both Mogia and Bawari, despite his father holding a valid certificate.

Findings of Court:
The SDO's order was quashed for evident insubordination and failure to follow a directive from the Collector to issue the certificate.

Issues: The core issue was whether the petitioner could obtain a caste certificate recognizing him as Mogia, despite conflicting records.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the SDO's denial unjustified, emphasizing precedent that recognized the Mogia caste as a Scheduled Tribe and affirmed that existing family certifications can validate the applicant's claim.

Result: The petition was allowed, requiring the immediate issuance of the caste certificate and imposing costs on the SDO.

ORDER :

SUBODH ABHYANKAR, J.

1] Heard.

2] This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

3] The grievance of the petitioner is that vide order dated 07.10.2019, the claim of the petitioner for issuance of scheduled tribe caste certificate has been rejected by the respondent No.3 SDO, Neemuch. Vide the impugned order dated 07.10.2019, the respondent No.3 has observed that since in the revenue record, the caste of the petitioner has been at some place Mogia and at other places Bawari, hence, he cannot be issued the caste certificate.

4] The petitioner has relied upon the caste certificate issued to his father on 18.06.2016, by the respondent No.3, and has also relied upon the Circular issued by the State Government (Annexure P/9) dated 11.08.2016, wherein it has been provided that for the conformation of one’s caste, the caste certificate issued to his/her father, uncle, brother, sister or grand-father, subsequent to 1996 by the SDO, shall be admissible. Thus, it is submitted that since the caste certificate holding that the father of the petitioner belongs to Mogia caste, which is a scheduled tribe in the year 2016 would be applicable to the case of the petitioner also and it cannot be said that the petitioner’s caste cannot be verified. .

5] Counsel has also relied upon a decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of M.P. and others Vs. Dule Singh Solanki and others reported as 2014 (2) MPLJ 239 wherein this Court has held that the caste Mogia has to be treated as scheduled tribe while referring to the Fourth Schedule, Amendment of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes), Order, 1950 in which at Serial No.16 Mogia caste has been mentioned, and this Court, also relying upon a Circular issued by the State Government on 26.11.2002 has held that Mogia is a Scheduled Tribe and not a Scheduled caste. Thus, it is submitted that the impugned order be set aside, and the respondents be directed to issue the appropriate caste certificate to the petitioner, mentioning his caste as Mogia, which is a scheduled tribe.

6] A reply to the petition, and an additional reply to the rejoinder have also been filed by the State. Counsel for the respondents/State has submitted that no case for interference is made out as there is ambiguity in the revenue record furnished by the petitioner for determination of his caste and thus, when there are two castes mentioned in the revenue record itself, no case for interference is made out. It is also submitted that even in the Will (Annexure R/5) filed along with additional reply, which has been executed by the great-grand-father of the petitioner, he has mentioned his own caste as Bawari and, thus, it is submitted that in such circumstances, no case for interference is made out.

7] In rebuttal, counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the order dated 05.08.2019, passed by the Collector, Neemuch (Annexure P/6) arising out of the order passed by the SDO, whereby the SDO had earlier rejected the application filed by the applicant/petitioner for issuance of caste certificate for scheduled tribe. In the aforesaid order passed by the Collector, it has been specifically held that the Mogia caste is also referred to as the Bawari, and has also relied upon the Circular dated 11.08.2016 in which it is provided that the caste certificate has to be issued where it has already been issued to the father, brother and sister of the applicant and no further scrutiny is required to be carried out. In the aforesaid order, the Collector has also directed the SDO to issue the caste certificate, however, the SDO, instead of issuing the caste certificate has again held that due to ambiguity in the revenue record, the caste certificate cannot be issued.

8] Heard. Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the documents filed on record as also the order passed by the Division Bench of this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top