SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 183

VIVEK RUSIA
Shivnarayan – Appellant
Versus
Shyamlal – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Kumar Vijaywargiya for petitioner; Sameer Saxena for respondents.

ORDER

1. Petitioner/plaintiff has filed this present petition being aggrieved by order dated 9.9.2022 whereby application filed under Order 26 rule 9 of the CPC has been dismissed. The petitioner/plaintiff filed the suit in respect of the suit land mentioned in paragraph No.2 of the plaint. According to the plaintiff, the defendants/respondents has encroached over some part of the land of his ownership. The petitioner/plaintiff applied for demarcation which was conducted by the Tehsildar and the possession of defendant was found hence that gave the cause of action to file the suit for possession.

2. The defendants have filed a written statement denying the averment made in the plaint, they have also denied the demarcation as well as the report submitted by the revenue authorities. Before adducing the evidence, the plaintiff has filed an application under Order 26 rule 9 C.P.C. seeking direction for demarcation of the suit land bearing survey No.201/1/2 area 1.0110 Hectare through any revenue authorities. The application was opposed by the defendants and the learned Court has dismissed the application on the ground that the said provision cannot be invoked for the collection of the e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top