SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 666

ANAND PATHAK
ABHISHEK RAGHUVANSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER : – By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the challenge has been made to the order dated 10-12-2021 and 28-12-2021 (Annexure P-1 and P/2 respectively) passed by the respondent No. 2; whereby it has been decided to outsource the services through the Outsourcing Agency and has also directed to conduct the fresh selection for appointment on the post of Assistant Grade- III/Data Entry Operator by conducting an open written examination.

2. The brief facts leading to filing of this case are that the respondent No. 2 issued directions dated 25-1-2018 by which the procedure for appointment of Assistant Grade-III/Data Entry Operator through the outsourcing agency is envisaged. The petitioners were initially appointed as Assistant Grade-III/Data Entry Operator in their respective schools after appointment on contractual basis through the Outsourcing Agency namely; MPCON Ltd. The petitioners were performing their duties honestly and sincerely and their services were extended from time to time. To the utter surprise of the petitioners, the respondent No. 2 issued the impugned order dated 10-12-2021; whereby, the respondent No. 3 has been authorized to ou

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top