SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
ZIGITZA HEALTH CARE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NARESH KUMAR VERMA – Respondent
ORDER ANAND PATHAK, J. : – Regard being had to similitude of controversy, all the review petitions are heard and decided by this common order.
2. For convenience sake, facts as narrated in Review Petition No. 526/2021 are taken into consideration. Instant review petition has been preferred seeking review/recall of the order dated 28-4-2021 passed in Writ Appeal No. 457/2020 by which this Court while hearing the appeal preferred by respondent No. 2-National Health Mission partly allowed the appeal and modified the order dated 29-11-2019 passed in Writ Petition No. 2677/2018 by learned Writ Court whereby the petition preferred by respondent No. 2/National Health Mission against the order dated 31-1-2018 passed by the Legal Authority under Minimum Wages Act (Labour Court No. 1), Gwalior has been dismissed.
3. In this bunch of review petitions, Review Petition No. 642/20, 643/20, 645/20, 646/20, 647/20, 648/20, 649/20, 650/20, 651/20 and 652/20 originate from common order dated 29-5-2020 passed by Coordinate Bench in bunch of writ appeals preferred by review petitioner-M/s Zigitza Health Care Ltd. subject matter was same and arose out of the order passed by Writ Court. In those writ ap
Kamlesh Verma vs. Mayawati and others
Mahabir Singh vs. Subhash and others
State of W. B. and ors. vs. Kamal Sengupta and anr.
Indrajeet Singh vs. D.D.C. and ors.
V. K. Verma vs. Dawoodi Bohra Masjid Committee
State of Madhya Pradesh and another vs. Pradeep Kumar and another
Gagandeep Pratishthan Pvt. Ltd. and others vs. Mechano and another
Davinder Pal Sehgal and another vs. Partap Steel Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. and others
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : N. K. Gupta, Ravi Shankar Gupta, S. D. Bhadoriya For the Respondent : Sankalp Sharma, G. P. Chaurasiya
The central legal point established in the judgment is the determination of the employer-employee relationship under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and the liability for payment of wages and overtime.
Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on the record and does not allow for re-examination of the merits of a case.
Review jurisdiction cannot be exercised to rehear a case or correct an erroneous decision without evidence of an error apparent on the face of the record.
The power of review is limited to correcting patent errors, not re-evaluating merits; mere recommendations do not confer enforceable rights.
To become entitle for minimum of pay scale, one has to show required qualification and working against sanctioned post.
The jurisdictional issue can be raised at any stage of the proceeding and must be considered based on the date of cause of action. The court's jurisdiction is to be determined by the statutory mandat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.