SUBODH ABHYANKAR
JAIVARDHAN S/o SUDARSHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER : – This is the applicant’s IXth bail application filed under section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code The applicant is implicated in connection with Crime No. 124/2018 registered at Police Station : Pipliyamandi, District- Mandsaur MP) for offence punishable under sections 8/15, 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant is in custody since 16-5-2018.
2. Applicant’s earlier bail applications have already been dismissed by this Court either as withdrawn or on merit considering the fact that 90 Kg. of Poppy Straw has been seized from his possession.
3. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that although the earlier applications have been dismissed on merits however, until now the applicant has never raised the ground of improper sampling of the contraband. It is further submitted that the aforesaid contraband, i.e., 90 Kg. of Poppy Straw seized from the present applicant was kept in four bags, out of which, three bags weighed 24 Kg each of Poppy Straw and one bag had of 18 kgs of Poppy Straw. It is submitted that admittedly, the contents of the four bags were mixed together on a canvas and after mixing the same homogeneously, two samples each of 500 grams were taken out from it. Thus,
The court's decision was primarily based on the lack of clarity in the method of drawing samples of the seized narcotic drug, the quantity seized being less than the commercial quantity, and the leng....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the interpretation of the evidence and the precedent set by a previous court decision, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court ruled that the conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied due to the serious nature of the offences and the substantial quantity of contraband involved.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of precedent in granting bail, specifically regarding the admissibility of contraband samples and the influence of previous court d....
The recovery of narcotic contraband must be in conformity with the provisions of the NDPS Act and the relevant instructions issued by the Narcotics Control Bureau.
Improper sampling methods in narcotics cases can lead to doubts about the classification of seized substances, impacting the likelihood of conviction and the granting of bail.
The court reinforced that the stringent bail provisions under the NDPS Act require clear evidence of innocence, which was lacking in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.