Brijkishore Agarwal vs Dinesh Agarwal

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(MP) 243

ANAND PATHAK
Brijkishore Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Agarwal – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
R. S. Bansal for petitioner; Maan Singh Jadon, Government Advocate, for respondent No. 3/State.

Headnote: Read headnote

ORDER

1. The present petition is preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India taking exception to the order dated 12.3.2022 passed by First Civil Judge, Class-II Dabra, District Gwalior in Lok Adalat in which settlement reached between the parties has been reflected in compromise decree and it has been observed that compromise decree would come into effect after requisite registration.

2. It is the submission of learned counsel for petitioner that a suit was filed by the petitioner against the defendants/respondents No. 1 to 3 for declaration to the effect that suit property is under the right, title and interest of the petitioner. Defendants appeared and raised their intention for settlement of the case. Resultantly, an application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC was preferred by the parties and matter was placed in Lok Adalat before the trial Court.

3. On due consideration, looking to the intention of the parties as reflected in application under Order 23 rule 3 CPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document