SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 411

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Nishant Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Alok Bagrecha for petitioner; Puneet Shroti, Government Advocate for respondent/State; Sundaram Singh for objector.

ORDER

1. By the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is asking for following relief:-

“(i) That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly quash the FIR dated 13.4.2022 and also quash the resulting charge sheet no.264 of 2022, dated 20.5.2022 pending in the court of Xth Add. Sessions Judge, Bhopal.

(ii) That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly quash all the proceedings taken up in S.T. No.527/2022 on the file of Xth Add. Sessions Judge, Bhopal.

(iii) Any other relief/reliefs, order/orders, direction/directions which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper may kindly be granted to the petitioner.”

2. The facts in compendium leading to filing of this petition are as follows:-

(2.1) A complaint was filed by the complainant/respondent No.2 at Police Station Bagsevaniya, District Bhopal, in pursuance to which, the offence got registered on 13.4.2022 vide FIR/Crime No.263/2022 for the offence punishable under sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner.

(2.2) The complainant met with the petitioner first time in the year 2015 at Global Hospital, Arera Colony, where the petitioner was running a pharmacy store and the complaina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top