ORDER

1. Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, with the joint request of the parties, these petitions are analogously heard and being decided by this common order. Facts are being taken from W.P. No.2098 of 2010.

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondents to supply the copies of the documents as mentioned in Annexure-P/9 and other representation.

3. Facts of the case in short are as under:-

3.1. The petitioner in the services of M.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited was posted as District Manager in the year 1986. The petitioner was served with a charge-sheet dated 14.3.2005 in respect of irregularities in sale and purchase of Mung and causing loss to the tune of Rs.18,52,000/-. The petitioner submitted a reply to the charge-sheet denying the charges. The detail enquiry was conducted and the Enquiry Officer submitted a report to the effect that charge No.1 is partially proved and rest of the charges are not proved. The disciplinary authority did not agree with the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and on 8.8.2007 passed an order of dism