SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 246

VISHAL DHAGAT
Danish Rayin – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pradeep Vaveria for petitioner; Praveen Namdeo, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 18.4.2022 contained in Annexure-P/3 passed by respondent No.3/Collector, Chhatarpur (MP) in Case No.123/B121/Excise/2021-22. By impugned order vehicle belonging to petitioner bearing No.MP-16-CB-0502 and 500 quarters of liquor was confiscated.

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that petitioner has preferred an appeal before Commissioner Excise Department, Gwalior. It is submitted that law has been settled by this Court that vehicle cannot be confiscated by Collector so long as criminal case is pending. He places reliance on judgment passed by Single Bench in case of Sheikh Kaleem v. State of Madhya Pradesh in MCRC No.1296/2015 order dated 13.7.2015. In view of same, it is submitted that since law is settled in the matter, therefore, order of Collector be set aside and petitioner may be given vehicle on supurdiginama till criminal case is decided in trial.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for State supported the impugned order passed by Collector.

4. Heard the counsel for the parties.

5. Petitioner has placed reliance on an order which has been pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top