IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Rusia, J.
Kalu v. Collector, Khargone and Others
Writ Petition No. 14317 of 2023 (Indore);
Decided on 25.9.2023.
vkcdkjh vfèkfu;e] 1915 ¼e-ç-½ & èkkjk 34 ¼1½ ¼d½] 34 ¼1½ ¼[k½ rFkk 47&d & vfèkgj.k & ;ku esa Fkksd esa 60 yhVj ns'kh efnjk ikà xà & èkkjk 34 ¼1½ ¼d½ rFkk 34 ¼2½ d¢ vèkhu vijkèk d¢ fy, çFke bfÙkyk fji¨VZ ntZ dh xà & dysDVj }kjk ;ku vfèkx`ghr & dysDVj }kjk fopkj.k d¢ n©jku vfèkgj.k dk vkns'k ikfjr ugÈ fd;k tk ldrk & ;ku dk vfèkgj.k eftLVªsV }kjk ;k r¨ vfÒ;qä d¨ vfèkfu;e dh èkkjk 47&d d¢ vèkhu n¨"kfl) Bgjkrs le; ;k fQj n¨"kflf) d¢ i'pkr~ fd;k tk ldrk gSA ¼iSjk 8 ,oa 9½
Excise Act, 1915 (M. P.) -- Ss. 34 (1) (a), 34 (1) (b) and 47-A -- confiscation -- 60 bulk litres of country made liquor found in vehicle -- FIR lodged for offence under section 34 (1) (a) and 34 (2) -- vehicle confiscated by Collector -- order of confiscation cannot be passed by Collector during trial -- vehicle can be confiscated by Magistrate while convicting accused or after conviction under section 47-A of Act. [Paras 8 & 9
ORDER
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 29.12.2022, whereby the Collector, Khargone has passed an order of confiscation of vehicle bearing registration No.MP 09 WM 0397 in which 60 bulk litre of country made liquor was found.
2. An F.I.R. was registered under sections 34(1)(a) & 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act against the petitioner and other accused persons. The issue regarding confiscation of vehicle is no more res integra. This Court in similar circumstances in W.P. No.19528 of 2022 has held as under:-
“6. It is correct that the confiscation proceeding were initiated under section 47(A) of the Act during pendency of the trial, however, now the present petitioner has been acquitted vide judgment dated 7.10.2021 passed by the learned JMFC, Kukshi in RCT No. 200965/2015.
7. Section 47(A) of the Excise Act is reproduced below :
"47-A. Confiscation of seized intoxicants, articles, implements, utensils, materials, conveyance etc. (1) Whenever any offence covered by clause (a) of (b) of subsection (1) of section 34 is committed and the quantity of liquor found at the time or in the course of detection of offence exceeds fifty bulk litres, every office, empowered under section 52, while seizing any intoxicants, articles, 2 implements, utensils, materials, conveyance etc. under subsection (2) of Section 34 or section 52 of the Act, shall place on the property seized a mark indicating that the same has been so seized and shall without undue delay either produce the seized property before the officer not below the rank of District Excise Officer authorised by the State Government by a notification in this behalf (hereinafter referred to as the Authorised Officer), or where having regard to its quantity or bulk or any other genuine difficulty it is not ex-pedient to do so, make a report containing all the details about the seizure to him.
(2) When the Collector, upon production before him of intoxicants, articles, implements, utensils, materials, conveyance etc. or on receipt of a report about such seizure as the case may be, is satisfied that an offence covered by clause (a) or clause (b) of sub -section (1) of section 34 has been committed and where the quantity of liquor found at the time or in the course of detection of such offence exceeds fifty bulk litres he may, on the ground to be recorded in writing, order the confiscation of the intoxicants, articles, implements, utensils, materials, conveyance etc. so seized. He may, during the pendency of the proceedings for such confiscation also pass an order of interim nature for the custody, disposal etc. of the confiscated intoxicants, articles, implements, utensils, materials, conveyance etc.as may appear to him to be necessary in the circumstances of the case.
(3) No order under sub-section (2) shall be made unless the Collector has—
(a) sent an intimation in a form prescribed by the Excise Commissioner about initiation of proceedings for confiscation of seized intoxicants, articles, implements, utensils, materials, conveyance, etc. to the Court having jurisdiction to try the offence on account of which the seizure has been made;
(b) issued a notice in writing to the person from whom such intoxicants, articles, implements, utensils, materials, conveyance, etc. have been seized and to any person staking claim to and to any other person who may appear before the Collector to have an interest in it;
(c) afforded an opportunity to the persons referred to in clause (b) above of making a representation against proposed confiscation;
(d) given to the officer effecting the seizure under sub-section (1) and to the person or persons who have been noticed under clause (b) a hearing."
8. This Court has repeatedly held that under sub-section 2 of section 47(A), the Collector upon recording satisfaction that the offence is covered by Clause A or Clause B of sub-section 2 of the Act has bee
Confiscation proceedings under the M.P. Excise Act are independent of criminal trials, and an acquittal does not invalidate a confiscation order.
The acquittal of accused in a criminal trial must be considered in confiscation proceedings, protecting property rights under Article 300A.
Premature confiscation of property under the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act is impermissible and may cause irreparable loss.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.