SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 578

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ravindranath Chaturvedi, Advocate, Dinesh Patel, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J. - Also heard on I.A No.25417 of 2022 which is an application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C for suspension of sentence moved on behalf of appellant.

2. The appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 420 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 03 years with fine of Rs.4,000/- with default stipulations.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the matter. The learned trial Court has erred in not appreciating the fact that there are material omissions and contradictions in the version of the prosecution witnesses. The jail sentence of the appellant has been suspended by the Trial Court till 19.01.2023 and during bail he did not misuse the liberty granted to him. It is further submitted that there is no likelihood of hearing of appeal in near future. Hence, counsel prayed that application for suspension of sentence be allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand has opposed the application and prays for its rejection.

5. In due consideration of the submissions made on behalf of the appellant, o n perusal of the record and looking to the fact that the jail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top