SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1209

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Dharu – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Gupta, Advocate, Mukesh Sharma, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J. - This is the first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of bail. The applicant has been implicated in connection with Crime No.123/2022, registered at Police Station - Industrial Area, Jaora, District Ratlam (M.P.) for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. The applicant is in custody since 03/11/2022.

2. As per prosecution story, the allegation against the applicant is that he is involved in the offence wherein some unknown persons have broken the lock of complainant's house and stolen golden and silver ornaments including some cash amount. Accordingly, offence has been registered and after investigation present applicant has been implicated in the offence.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no legal evidence available on record to connect the applicant with the aforementioned offence. Except some cash amount nothing has been recovered from the possession of the present applicant. Offence is exclusively triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Investigation is over and charge sheet has been filed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top