SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1205

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J.
Shivraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 61059 of 2022
Decided On : 26-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Harshvardhan Pathak, Advocate, Mukesh Sharma, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant bail during trial under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, based on the facts and circumstances of the case, including the period of custody, absence of criminal antecedent, and likelihood of a prolonged trial.

Headnote:

Bail - M.P. Excise Act, 1915 - The court allowed the application for bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, for the applicant facing trial for an offence under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act, 1915, directing the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed an application for bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he was facing trial for an offence under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act, 1915, and had been in custody since 12.12.2022. The prosecution story involved the recovery of 60 bulk liters of country made liquor from the possession of the applicant based on source information.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, allowed the application for bail without commenting on the merits of the case. The court directed the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and compliance with the provisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail during trial, considering the nature of the offence, the period of custody, and the arguments presented by the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the period of custody, the absence of criminal antecedent, and the likelihood of a prolonged trial. The court also considered the arguments presented by the parties and the material available on record, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application for bail and directed the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions. The order would remain effective till the end of the trial, subject to compliance with the pre-conditions of bail.

JUDGMENT

Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J. - This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, for grant of bail during trial. The applicant is facing trial in connection with Crime No.425/2022 registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Rajgarh for offence under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act, 1915. Applicant is in jail since 12.12.2022.

2. As per the prosecution story, on 24.06.2022, on the basis of source information police recovered 60 bulk liters of country made liquor from the possession of the applicant. On the basis of which police registered the aforesaid crime.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime. Investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant is in custody since 12.12.2022 and he has no criminal antecedent. Conclusion of trial will take sufficient long time. Under these circumstances, prayer was made for grant of bail to the applicant.

4. Learned Government Advocate opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, on perusal of the material available on record including the case diary, without commenting on the merits of the case, this application is allowed.

7. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. It is also directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

8. This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial, but in case of bail jump and breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become ineffective and cancelled without reference to this Bench.

9. The M.Cr.C. stands allowed and disposed off.

Certified Copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top