SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nandita Dubey, J.
Sushma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 61200 of 2022
Decided On : 26-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Sharad Verma, Advocate, K.S. Patel, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court's decision to grant anticipatory bail was influenced by the specific allegations against the applicant and the absence of accusation regarding the use of a weapon in the assault case.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Assault - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant who was apprehending arrest in connection with a case involving assault. The court considered the allegations and the lack of specific accusation against the applicant in using a weapon, and granted bail with certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving assault under various sections of the IPC. The complainant alleged that the applicant kicked him during an incident where he was assaulted with a rod by other individuals.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the application for anticipatory bail and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety. The court also imposed specific conditions to be complied with by the applicant.

Issues: The main issue was the apprehension of arrest by the applicant in connection with the assault case and the request for anticipatory bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the specific allegations against the applicant and the lack of accusation regarding the use of a weapon, which influenced the decision to grant anticipatory bail.

Final Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with certain conditions to be complied with, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.

JUDGMENT

Nandita Dubey, J. - This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the present applicant.

2. T h e applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Crime No.665/2022 registered at Police Station Pathariya, District Damoh for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 323, 294, 326, and 506/34 of IPC.

3. As per prosecution a complaint was lodged by the complainant that while he was returning on his motorcycle at about 09.30 pm on 27.11.2022, one Mahendra Jain and Rahul Jain stopped him on the way and assaulted him with rod. It is stated that the present applicant kicked him.

4. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the complainant has received injuries on hand and head, however, as per FIR it has been caused by iron rod which has been used by the co-accused Mahendra Jain, Rahul Jain and Aman Jain. There is no allegation on the present applicant of using iron rod or any stick.

5. Considering the aforesaid, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer.

6. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by her;

    2 . The applicant will make herself available as and when called for interrogation and cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during trial;

    5. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and

    6. If the applicant commit any offence while being on anticipatory bail, then this order shall automatically stand cancelled without reference to the Court.

    Certified copy as per rules.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top