SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1185

PRANAY VERMA
Arjun Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ramesh Yadav, Advocate, Rahul Solanki, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Pranay Verma, J. - They are heard. Perused the case diary /challan papers.

2. This is the first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as the applicant is implicated in connection with Crime No.699/2022 registered at Police Station Narsinghgarh, District Rajgarh for offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act.

3. The applicant is in custody since 2.11.2022.

4. The allegation against the applicant is that from the possession of applicant 80 bulk litres of illicit liquor has been seized.

5. Counsel for the applicant submits that he has not committed any offence alleged by the prosecution. He is in jail since 2.11.2022. Investigation is complete and challan has been filed. Final conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long time and material produced by the prosecution appears to be insufficient against him. Therefore, the applicant be released on bail.

6. Counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and prays for rejection of the application. He submits that the applicant is having 3 more criminal antecedents.

7. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top