Back
PRANAY VERMA
Mahesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pranay Verma, J. - This is first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The applicant is implicated in connection with Crime No.384/2022, registered at Police Station Maxi, District Shajapur, for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act.
2. The applicant is in custody since 14.12.2022.
3. The allegation against the applicant is that from the possession of applicant 63 bulk litre unauthorized country made liquor has been seized.
4. Counsel for the applicant submits that he has not committed any offence alleged by the prosecution. He is in jail since 14.12.2022. Investigation is complete and challan has been filed. Final conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long time and material produced by the prosecution appears to be insufficient against him. Therefore, the applicant be released on bail.
5. Counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and prays for rejection of the application as three criminal antecedents are registered against the applicant under the Excise Act.
6. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and going through the case diary, in the opi
Grant of bail based on the amount of seized liquor and period of custody, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the amount of liquor seized and the period of custody already undergone by the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the amount of seized liquor and the period of custody undergone by the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of legal evidence to connect an accused with an alleged offence under the M.P. Excise Act, influencing the court's decision to g....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the quantity of seized liquor, pending report on the nature of the liquor, and the period of custody suff....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the absence of seizure from the applicant's possession and the open place of seizure, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Grant of bail based on lack of criminal past, trial being triable by lower court, and expected time for trial conclusion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
