SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1093

VISHAL DHAGAT
Atul Paraste – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashish K Mishra, Advocate, D.K.Paroha, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Vishal Dhagat, J. - This is first application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. Applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.511/2022, registered at Police Station-Samnapur District-Dindori (M.P.) for offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 327, 506, 34 of IPC.

3 . Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that false allegation is made out against applicant for demand of money to drink liquor. It is submitted that a counter case has also been lodged by applicant against complainant party. It is submitted that there is dispute between parties. Offence under Section 327 of IPC is alleged so that applicant may not get bail. In these circumstances, prayer is made that applicant may be released on anticipatory bail.

4. Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the application for bail.

5. Heard the counsel for the parties.

6. Applicant is the first offender with no criminal record.

7. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.

8. It is ordered that in the event of arrest of applicant in connection with aforesaid crime

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top