SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 556

DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Yogesh Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Pramod Pachori, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J. - This is first application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The applicant apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.22/2020 registered at Police Station Bahodapur District Gwalior (MP) for the offence punishable under Sections 420 of IPC.

3. The allegation against present applicant is that a financial transactions took place between the applicant and complainant to the tune of Rs.37 lacs but present applicant did not repay the said amount. Offence was registered.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. It is also submitted that the incident said to have taken place between December, 2015 to June-2017 and FIR was lodged after three years of the incident. He is ready to cooperate in the investigation. There is no likelihood of her absconding or tempering with the prosecution case. He is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions which may be imposed by this Court while granting anticipatory bail. Hence, it is prayed that applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

5. On the other hand, learned Public Prose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top