SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1165

VIVEK AGARWAL
Sidhi Hospital Sidhic – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lal Raj Bahoran Singh Chouhan, Advocate, Rohit Jain, Advocate
Final Result : Disposed Of

JUDGMENT

Vivek Agarwal, J. - Shri Rohit Jain submits that under the provisions contained in the M.P. Upcharyagriha Tatha Rujopchar Sambandhi Sthapanaye (Registrikaran Tatha Anugyapan) Adhiniyam, 1973, there is a provision for appeal under Section 6(3) and, therefore, petitioner having alternate statutory remedy be relegated to avail said remedy.

2. Shri Lal Raj Bahoran Singh Chouhan, in his turn, submits that a Coordinate Bench in W.P. No.28483/2022 vide order dated 09.12.2022 has taken cognizance of the matter and has issued notice and granted interim relief to the petitioner therein.

3. A fact of the matter is that learned Government Advocate who appeared before the Coordinate Bench did not brought this fact to the Hon'ble Coordinate Bench that there exists an alternative remedy under Section 6(3) of the M.P. Upcharyagriha Tatha Rujopchar Sambandhi Sthapanaye (Registrikaran Tatha Anugyapan) Adhiniyam, 1973, therefore, this aspect being not available before the Coordinate Bench, the order the Coordinate Bench in view of alternative statutory remedy will not be treated as a president and, therefore, petitioner is not entitled to seek any parity.

In view of the statutory alternative rem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top