SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1138

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vishal Dhagat, J.
Mukesh Suryawanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 2022 of 2022
Decided On : 12-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Anshul Tiwari, Advocate, Ajeet Rawat, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Procedure - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, considering the length of time the applicant had been in jail, the nature of the offence, and the fact that the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. The court imposed specific conditions for the bail, including regular attendance at the trial court and marking presence before the police station on the first of every month.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant had been arrested in connection with an offence under Section 34(2) of the MP Excise Act and had been in jail since 22.11.2022. The applicant sought bail based on the lack of evidence against him, while the State opposed the application citing the applicant's criminal records.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, considering the length of time the applicant had been in jail, the nature of the offence, and the fact that the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. The court emphasized that the decision did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues: Grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, applicant's criminal records, and the nature of the offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the length of time the applicant had been in jail, the nature of the offence, and the fact that the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail as key factors in granting bail. The court also imposed specific conditions for the bail.

Final Decision: The applicant was granted bail on specific conditions, including regular attendance at the trial court and marking presence before the police station on the first of every month.

JUDGMENT

Vishal Dhagat, J. - This is first application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail to the applicant, who has been arrested on 22.11.2022 in connection with Crime No.257/2021 for offence under Section 34(2) of the MP Excise Act registered at Police Station-Junnardev, District-Chhindwara (M.P.).

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant is in jail since 22.11.2022. Applicant is made accused only on basis of memorandum. No other evidence is available against the applicant. On said grounds, counsel for applicant prays for bail to the applicant.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the application for grant of bail and submitted that applicant is having criminal records of five criminal cases registered against him. Applicant is repeatedly involved in committing offence. In these circumstances, he prayed for rejection of bail application.

4. Heard the counsel for the parties.

5. Applicant is in jail since 22.11.2022. Offence committed by applicant is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. Trial is likely to take some more time. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, bail application filed by applicant, is allowed on following conditions :

    1. If applicant is found involved in any other offence in future then prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

    2 . Applicant will regularly attend the trial Court and will appear before the trial Court on all dates, and in exceptional circumstances can file application for exemption giving reasons before the Court and Court shall consider the same on its merits.

    3. Applicant will mark his presence before police station Junnardev, District-Chhindwara (MP) on first of every month till completion of trial.

    6. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-(Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety and security in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

    7. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C. as under:-

      (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;

      (b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected and;

      (c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

      C.C. as per rules.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top