IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Ku.Shiva Bhadoriya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 6664 of 2021 with Criminal Appeal No. 6678 of 2021
Decided On : 12-09-2022
JUDGMENT
1. Both Criminal Appeals arise out of Judgment and Sentence dated 29-10-2021 passed by Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Gwalior in Special Case No.300013 of 2016 by which the Appellants have been convicted for the following offences :
| S.No. | Appellant | Convicted under | Sentence |
| 1
| Shiva Bhadoriya | S. 120-B of IPC | 2 years R.I. and fine of Rs.2,000/- in default 3 months R.I. |
|
| S. 7 P.C. Act | 3 years R.I. and fine of Rs.4,000/- in default 6 months R.I. | |
|
| S. 13(1)(d)/13(2) P.C. Act R/w 120 B IPC | 4 years R.I. and fine of Rs.4,000/- in default 6 months R.I. | |
| 2
| Anand Kumar Shukla | S. 120-B of IPC | 2 years R.I. and fine of Rs.2,000/- in default 3 months R.I. |
|
| S. 7 P.C. Act | 3 years R.I. and fine of Rs.4,000/- in default 6 months R.I. | |
|
| S. 13(1)(d)/13(2) P.C. Act R/w 120 B IPC | 4 years R.I. and fine of Rs.4,000/- in default 6 months R.I. |
All the sentences shall run concurrently.
2. The prosecution story in short is that on 24-6-2014, the complainant Aslam Khan made a written complaint to Superintendent of Police, S.P.E. (Lokayukut) Gwalior unit that he and his brother Ashiq Khan are having total 5 bigha of land in village Kulaith. He and his brother Ashiq Khan have a doubt that area of survey no. 980 and 944 is less, therefore, they wanted to get the said land demarcated. Since there is no dispute regarding ownership, therefore, he made an application for demarcation in Jan Mitra Suvidha Kendra, village Kulaith on 23-5-2014 along with Khasra, Aks as well as requisite fee. The last date for completion of demarcation was 13-6-2014. 7 days after making application, he met with Appellant Anand Kumar Shukla and requested for demarcation, then Appellant Anand Kumar Shukla directed him to meet the Appellant Shiva Bhadoriya and also instructed him that he should pay the amount which will be demanded by her. Accordingly, he met with Appellant Shiva Bhadoriya, who demanded Rs. 15,000/- @ Rs. 5,000/- per Bigha. After negotiations, She agreed for Rs. 7,000/- and clarified that without illegal gratification of Rs.7,000/- She will not carry out the demarcation. Since, he is not interested to pay Rs. 7,000/- to the Appellant Anand Kumar Shukla and Shiva Bhadoriya, therefore, complaint was made.
3. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Police, directed Atul Singh to investigate the matter. On 24-6-2014 itself, Atul Singh, in order to verify the contents of the complaint, gave a digital voice recorder to the complainant and instructed him to record the conversation. The complainant was also informed about the manner of operating the voice recorder. Constable Bhag Singh was also sent along with the complainant. While the complainant was going towards the house of Appellant Shiva Bhadoriya, She met him on his way. Thereafter, at the request of the Appellant Shiva Bhadoriya, he went to Phool Bag Square with Shiva Bhadoriya on his motor cycle and also got the conversation recorded. He handed over the voice recorder to Bhag Singh in a sealed condition after keeping the same in an envelop. As the investigating officer Atul Singh was busy in other matters, therefore, Bhag Singh, kept the sealed envelop containing voice recorder in an Almirah. On 26-6- 2014, the sealed envelop was opened and panchnama was prepared. Thereafter, the complainant identified the voice and a separate panchnama was prepared. A transcript was prepared and a certificate under Section 6 5-B of EVIDENCE ACT was also given. Another complaint was presented by the complainant and accordingly, the Superintendent of Police, S.P.E. (Lokayukt), directed the investigating officer to proceed with the investigation. Thereafter, the case was registered at serial no. 0/14 and complaint was sent to Police Station, S.P.E.(Lokayukt) Bhopal for registration of offence. Accordingly, crime no. 284/2014 was registered at Bhopal
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt, and the permissibility of drawing inferential ....
In assessing cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, mere inquiries about bribe amounts do not equate to a legal demand, and evidence must be compelling to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The need for corroboration of evidence in corruption cases, the importance of a valid sanction, and the requirement to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The judgment emphasizes the necessity for the prosecution to establish the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, as well as the pending work with the accused, to sustain a conviction under ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.