SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Raju Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Misc. Criminal Case No. 31636 of 2022
Decided On : 01-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Ravi Shankar Patel, Advocate for The Applicant, for the Appellant; Shri vivek lakhera, governent advocate for the State, for the Respondent

Headnote:

Bail Application - Criminal Procedure - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, considering the nature of injuries sustained by the victim, lack of prima facie case under Section 307 of IPC, completion of investigation, and filing of charge sheet.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with a case involving multiple criminal offenses. The first bail application was dismissed with liberty to renew after victims are examined in the Court of law.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the evidence, including the victim's statements, MLC report, and X-ray report, and concluded that the injuries sustained by the victim were simple in nature. It allowed the bail application, directing the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions.

Issues: Nature of injuries, prima facie case under Section 307 of IPC, completion of investigation, and filing of charge sheet.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of injuries, lack of prima facie case under Section 307 of IPC, completion of investigation, and filing of charge sheet as key factors in allowing the bail application.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application, directing the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions, effective till the end of the trial, and issued directions related to Covid-19 guidelines for the jail authorities and the State Government.

JUDGMENT

1. This is second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant, who is in custody since 15.11.2021 in connection with Crime No.226/2021 registered at Police Station Belkhera, District Jabalpur for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 324, 506/34, 307 of IPC and 25/27 of Arms Act.

2. First bail application i.e. M.Cr.C. No.4181/2022 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 08.02.2022 with liberty to renew prayer after victims are examined in the Court of law.

3. It is submitted that Shankar Singh was examined before the Court of law on 13.06.2022. His statements do not corroborate with the injuries narrated by him. There is no gun shot injury. There are only two lacerated wounds. On X- ray report injuries were found to be simple in nature.

4. In para 7 of his cross-examination, he has admitted that police had earlier lodged FIR under Sections 452, 324, 506/34 of IPC. Though he mentioned that the bullet which was fired from the firearm is still embedded in his body but X- ray report is contrary to this fact. Injuries sustained are simple in nature. It is further submitted that in para-3 of his cross-examination, he has admitted that two cases are registered against him one under Section 302 of IPC and another under Section 307 of IPC.

5. He was convicted in appeal under Section 307 of IPC. Against the order of conviction, appeal is pending and he is on bail.

6. Taking all these facts and evidence which has come on record and MLC report which has been read over by Shri Vivek Lakhera, Government Advocate for the State so also the X-ray report it is evident that the nature of injuries sustained by the victim Shankar Singh were simple in nature. It is further submitted that out of the local rivalry applicant has been falsely implicated.

7. Taking all these facts into consideration and especially the one that no case under Section 307 of IPC is prima facie made out, investigation is complete and charge sheet is filed, no further custodial interrogation of the applicant is required but without commenting anything on merits of the case, this bail application is allowed.

8. It is directed that applicant- Raju Singh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty T6ousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court to appear before the said Court on the dates given by the concerned Court during pendency of trial. It is further directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

9. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become ineffective.

10.. I n view of the outbreak of new mutant Omicron of Covid-19, the jail authorities and the State Government are directed to follow the guidelines issued by the Health Ministry in the wake of Novel Corona Virus before and after releasing the applicant.

11. Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top