SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 1278

ANAND PATHAK
SUNITA GANDHARVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant : H. K. Shukla
For Respondent: C. P. Singh, Gaurav Mishra

Table of Content
1. application for cancellation of bail under atrocities act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. evidence for bail violation and ongoing threat to victim. (Para 3 , 4)
3. accused's arguments against cancellation of bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. state's position and external legal perspectives. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. discussion on legislative intent and reformation in laws. (Para 11 , 12)
6. important questions framed regarding bail conditions. (Para 17 , 18)
7. analysis on jurisdiction and precedence of laws. (Para 19 , 20)
8. emphasis on victim's rights and legislative interpretation. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
9. conclusions on misinterpretation affecting victim's rights. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
10. arguments about community service as a rehabilitative measure. (Para 31 , 72 , 76)
11. final court decision on non-cancellation of bail. (Para 32 , 82)
12. court directions and disposition of the case. (Para 83 , 84 , 85)

ORDER : – The instant application under section 439(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicant /complainant (hereinafter shall be referred to as “complainant”) for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No. 2/accused (hereinafter shall be referred as “accused”), who wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top