IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Lakhan Jatav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.6200 of 2022
Decided On : 08-02-2022
Bail Application - IPC and POCSO Act - The court granted bail to the applicant based on the prosecutrix's statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., indicating her affection towards the applicant and the absence of allegations of force or coercion in their relationship.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, citing completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet. The prosecutrix stated under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. that she had affection towards the applicant and was living with him willingly.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the prosecutrix's statement, completion of investigation, and filing of charge sheet, and granted bail to the applicant without commenting on the merits of the case.
Issues: Bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for offences under IPC and POCSO Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court deemed it appropriate to release the applicant on bail based on the prosecutrix's statement indicating her affection towards the applicant and the absence of allegations of force or coercion.
Final Decision: The applicant was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond and sureties, with directions to comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. The bail was effective till the end of the trial, subject to conditions and guidelines related to the Novel Corona/Omicron Virus.
JUDGMENT
Vivek agarwal, J. - This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail on behalf of the applicant-Lakhan Jatav, who is in custody since 19/12/2021 in connection with Crime No.470/2021 registered at Police Station Tendukheda, Distt. Narsinghpur (M.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366a, 376, 376(2)(n) of IPC and also under Section 5L/6 of POCSO act.
It is submitted that investigation is complete, charge sheet is filed. In her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., prosecutrix has clearly mentioned that she has affection towards applicant and she was not aware of the fact nor the applicant that they cannot enter into wedlock before attaining the age of 18 years but they had eloped together and entered into wedlock. She was living out of her own sweet will with the present applicant like husband and wife and there is no allegation of use of force or coercion so to constitute any of the offences. Trial will take time for its conclusion, hence prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.
On the other hand, Shri ajay Tamrakar, learned Panel Lawyer, opposes the bail application.
Taking the fact into consideration the fact that in her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C, prosecutrix stated that she has affection with applicant and she was living out of her own sweet will with the present applicant like husband and wife, investigation is complete and charge sheet is filed, this Court deems it appropriate to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.
It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his appearance before the said Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.
This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become ineffective.
The jail authorities and the State Government are directed to follow the guidelines issued by the Health Ministry in the wake of Novel Corona/Omicron Virus, before and after releasing the applicant.
Certified copy as per rules.
The court granted bail to the applicant based on the prosecutrix's statement indicating her affection towards the applicant and the absence of allegations of force or coercion in their relationship.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant bail based on the completion of investigation, the time trial would take, and the lack of requirement for custodial....
Consent and permanent residency can be considered as grounds for granting bail in cases of abduction and rape.
The solemnized marriage and cohabitation of the applicant and the prosecutrix were considered as grounds for granting bail.
The court considered the maturity of the prosecutrix and the completion of the investigation as crucial factors in granting bail to the applicant.
The decision to grant bail was based on the specific circumstances of the case, including the delayed FIR and the likelihood of a long trial.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.