RAVI MALIMATH, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Satyendra Kosha – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, High Court – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. - This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, has been filed seeking directions to the respondents No.1 and 2 to enquire and investigate in the matter as to how certain documents which were not exhibited were placed in the record of the trial Court.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is an accused in a complaint case pending against him before the competent Court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. The petitioner has filed this petition stating that on 06.05.2015, the respondent No.3- complainant appeared before the Court below for his examination-in- chief and he exhibited seven documents which were marked as Exhibit P-1 to Exhibit-P-7. On 26.09.2015, upon completion of the cross- examination of the respondent No.3, his evidence was closed and the matter was proceeded further. At the time of his examination-in-chief i.e. on 06.05.2015, Shri Santosh Kumar Kol, was the Presiding Judge, however, on the date of conclusion of the cross-examination of the respondent No.3-complainant, the Presiding Officer was Dr. Umashankar.
The petitioner further states that when the matter was being prepared for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.