SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1427

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Ramesh Chandra Bairagi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nitin Vyas, Advocate, Gourav Panchal, Advocate, Nisha Jaiswal, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Rajendra Kumar Verma, J. - These are the first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicants, who are implicated in connection with Crime No.310/2021, registered at Police Station - Rajgarh, District - Dhar, concerning offence under Sections 376(2)(n), 366, 323 and 506 of IPC. The applicants are in jail since 01.12.2021.

As per the prosecution, the allegations against the applicant Vijay are that he has abducted the prosecutrix and committed rape upon her without her consent and the allegations against the applicant is that he has assaulted on the husband of the prosecutrix. Hence, the police has registered the crime against the applicants.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have falsely been implicated. Both the applicants are father and son. The FIR was delayed by four and half months. The prosecutrix is a married lady and she was a consenting party and was living with the applicant for three months. applicant Ramesh Chandra was not named in the FIR at the time of lodging FIR. The prosecutrix was in contact with the applicant Vijay and chatting with him on whatsap even after the incid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top